What Farmers Need to Know About the Proposed Clean Water Act
Brian Besley, OFEC Steering
Committee member and AGCare Chair
Bill 43, the Clean
Water Act, was introduced by the McGuinty government on December 5,
2005. The Ontario Farm Environmental Coalition (OFEC) steering committee and
agricultural organization staff have been working hard on this issue on behalf
of Ontario's farmers and we will strive to communicate any developments to farmers
as best we can.
Essentially, the
Clean Water Act seeks to direct local communities, organized by
major watersheds, to create Source Water Protection Plans by examining and mapping
any potential threats to water quality and taking action to reduce or remove
these threats. It empowers local authorities, such as municipalities through
proposed permit officials, to take preventative measures before a threat to
water quality develops.
Farmers are, of
course, supportive of the concept of drinking water source protection plans
for all watersheds in Ontario. Targeting regulatory standards and funding programs
based on risk and linked to a local Source Water Protection Plan could provide
a practical and workable framework for making positive drinking water quality
improvement progress.
OFEC's analysis
of the proposed Clean Water Act is that it lacks appropriate checks
and balances; it lacks proper legal, technical, political and fiscal municipal
and provincial governance accountability; and in many important and significant
ways, contradicts Justice O'Connor's Walkerton Inquiry Recommendations.
OFEC has obtained
a legal opinion, which concluded "Bill 43 will have serious consequences
for landowners, operating to effectively expropriate lands without any apparent
compensation." The proposed Act is likely to lead to conflict between rural
municipalities and farmers and could infringe on their ability to exercise normal
farm practices.
Consistent with
Justice O'Connor's Walkerton Inquiry Recommendation #16 (The provincial government,
through the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs in collaboration
with the Ministry of the Environment, should establish a system of cost-share
incentives for water protection projects on farms.), the government must
provide compensation to agricultural landowners who are restricted in a material
way by source water protection measures. The Walkerton Inquiry Recommendations
were crafted to firmly establish. the link between provincial authority to regulate
and the provincial responsibility to offer fair and reasonable compensation
and funding assistance. OFEC has suggested a mechanism similar to the Manitoba
Water Protection Act, which establishes a Stewardship Fund to provide longterm,
sustainable funding to assist impacted municipalities and impacted agricultural
landowners.
The proposed legislation
needs to be changed such that the Ministry of Environment (MOE) is prohibited
from approving any Source Water Protection Plans which do not include full details
of the cost of implementing the plan.
There needs to
be a socio-economic impact assessment of each Plan before it is approved. The
full cost of implementing the Source Water Protection Plan includes, at minimum,
long-term government administrative cost, farm business risk assessment plan
development, farm business on-going administrative cost, farm business ongoing
operating cost, farm business capital cost, and the farm business loss of land
use cost.
The proposed Clean
Water Act includes broad powers for municipal "permit officials"
without appropriate technical, political or fiscal accountability. OFEC is categorically
opposed to the proposed permit system. Municipal authority to regulate land
use to meet the Clean Water Act objectives should be based on
co-operative solutions and negotiations with impacted landowners rather than
unilateral permit official authority. Rather than a "Permit Official",
agricultural Source Water Protection goals could be co-operatively achieved
through an "Agricultural Risk Management Official" with the mandate
to negotiate solutions and offer both technical and funding assistance.
Our next opportunity
to amend Bill 43 is when it goes to the standing committee after second reading,
which is planned for the spring session of the legislature. OFEC is advocating
broad consultation and is currently working on suggested amendments.
We are committed
to working with the MOE to get this legislation right.
![]()