butocpah.gif (2019 bytes)

December 10 , 2002



By Brian Doidge, Market Analyst, Ridgetown College, University of Guelph


U.S. & World
Chicago markets continue to drift lower and are currently testing support levels established last spring around the $2.38 level in the MARCH contract, $2.42 in the JULY and $2.38 in the DEC ‘03. Something to notice is that in each more distant contract, current prices have slipped further below these initial support levels from last April. At current levels, Chicago traders have erased essentially the entire 2002 drought bull move.

Corn, Chatham
WKLY AVG ADJ TRACK BASIS
That is reflective of two things: a) Chicago’s concern about the ability of U.S. corn exports to achieve current USDA projections; and b) Chicago’s concern about expanded corn acreage in the spring thanks to enhanced support for feed grains relative to oilseeds under the 2002 U.S. Farm Bill.

We are currently technically ‘oversold’, so a bounce higher should be anticipated, especially before the New Year; but sustained movement higher is going to be difficult to generate without some meaningful improvement in export sales. Cumulative U.S. corn export inspections are running 15% behind year ago, which is bad enough but shows poorly versus wheat which is only 11% behind and soybeans which are 6% behind. Weakness in export sales and shipments gives comfort to spec funds looking to build net short positions leading into the usual farmer ‘tax-selling’ spike once we turn the New Year. Any rally now would likely be viewed as an opportunity to establish those short positions in anticipation of a slump later.

Given the magnitude of U.S. industrial demand, especially ethanol grind, there would not appear to be substantial downside risk of a major move lower. However, being nibbled to death by ducks is just as fatal as a swift thrust. Grinding lower is painful, especially if you have corn in storage.

Ontario
Stats Canada released its November field crop production estimates showing another increase in the corn crop. OCPA’s estimate of 203 million bushels was eclipsed by Stats Can’s 216 million bushels. Our yield guess of 108.3 bushels/acre is lower than Stats Can’s 113.1 bu/acre which is up more than 10 bu/acre from the 2001 crop. Bottom line? About 13 million bushels, around 6%, more corn than our last projection. However, we have not detected much softening of basis as a result. We may not. We will remain on an import basis despite the slightly bigger crop than anticipated. Imports will shrink a bit, but we will continue to import U.S. corn.

In an interesting sidelight, Stats Can says that production of genetically modified corn totaled 1.8 million metric tonnes in 2002, up 20% from 2001. What is interesting is that average yield for the GM corn was given as 117.9 bushels/acre versus 108.9 bu/acre for non-GM corn. Much of that better yield may be attributed to improved plant health and standability for Bt hybrids even if corn borer pressure was not substantial in all fields.

Bottom line? Price looks to drift sideways for some time to come with occasional rallies in Chicago, but nothing of substance.



butocpah.gif (2019 bytes)

1