By Greg Stewart, OMAFRA Corn Specialist
| Table 1 - The Impact of Fall Tillage Systems on Grain Corn Yield All tillage plots received secondary tillage in the spring prior to corn planting. (Trials conducted following various previous crops in the period 1979-1996). | ||||||
| Location(County) |
Soil
|
PreviousCrop
|
#
of Years
|
Fall
Tillage SystemsCrop Corn Yield (bu/ac)
|
||
|
Moldboard
|
Chisel
|
Offset
Disc
|
||||
| Milton (Halton) |
Clay
loam
|
Corn
|
3
|
117
|
109
|
109
|
| Elora (Wellington) |
Silt
loam
|
Corn
|
7
|
123
|
117
|
121
|
| Elora (Wellington) |
Silt
loam
|
Soybeans
|
2
|
118
|
118
|
124
|
| Comber (Essex) |
Clay
loam
|
Soybeans
|
3
|
124
|
117
|
124
|
| Morpeth (Kent) |
Clay
|
Soybeans
|
2
|
108
|
98
|
110
|
| Average |
118
|
112
|
118
|
|||
Data from T. Vyn, K. Janovicek and D. Young, University of Guelph.
Fall
Mulch Tillage
The chisel plow has been the most widely adopted fall mulch tillage tool in
Ontario, with tandem and offset discs also being used extensively in some areas
of the province. Tillage research trials conducted across Ontario over the past
20 years generally have shown that discing often results in more favorable soil
conditions and higher corn yields than chisel plowing. Table 1 summarizes the
corn yield data from these sites.
Chisel plowing with twisted shovel teeth may leave the soil quite ridged. This
can lead to extra costs in secondary tillage (more passes), uneven seed beds
and, occasionally, excessive soil drying. Using sweep teeth on all or part of
the chisel plow overcomes some of these problems, as does adding a leveling
bar or harrows to the rear of the chisel plow, or timely secondary tillage in
the spring.
| Table 2 - The Impact of Fall Tillage Systems on Grain Corn Yield Moldboard and Chisel plots received spring secondary tillage; Fall Tandem Disc Only plots were planted directly in the spring without any secondary tillage. | ||||||
|
Tillage
Systems Corn Yield (bu/ac)
|
||||||
| Location(County) |
Soil
|
PreviousCrop
|
#
ofYears
|
Moldboard
|
Chisel
|
Fall
Tandom
Disc Only |
| Alvinston (Lambton) |
Clay
|
Soybeans
|
3
|
95
|
86
|
91
|
| Fingal (Elgin) |
Silt
clay loam
|
Soybeans
|
3
|
159
|
154
|
154
|
| Centralia (Huron) |
Silt
loam
|
Wheat(straw
baled)
|
3
|
146
|
139
|
141
|
| Wyoming (Lambton) |
Silt
clay loam
|
Wheat(straw
baled)
|
3
|
159
|
155
|
157
|
| Average |
|
|
|
140
|
134
|
136
|
Data from T.Vyn, K. Janovicek, D. Hooker and G. Opuku, University of Guelph.
Tandem
Disc Only
Some of the earlier success with offset discing inspired a series of experiments
where the tandem disc was used in the fall. When fall discing is done in such
a way as to leave the soil level in the fall, single-pass corn planting (no
secondary tillage) becomes a viable option in the spring and is a good method
for reducing tillage costs. Table 2 outlines research conducted in Ontario where
this approach was taken. On average, using only the tandem disc yielded within
five bushel of the conventional tillage system. In some years, growers could
improve upon these results by doing some light spring tillage prior to corn
planting.
| Table 3 - Tillage system effects on grain corn yield following soybeans at Fingal (silty clay loam) and Alvinston (clay), 1994 - 1996 average. | ||
|
Fingal
|
Alvinston
|
|
|
Grain
corn yields @ 15.5 %
------------- bu/ac ------------- |
||
| Fall Moldboard + Spring Tillage |
159
|
96
|
| Spring Tillage Only |
156
|
96
|
| No Tillage |
154
|
90
|
(T. Vyn, D. Hooker and C. Swanton, U. of Guelph)
The
Disc and Compaction
We have been referring to fall discing where the risk of soil compaction is
less than if you disced in the spring. If you believe you have a compaction
problem, then you may be tempted to try more aggressive implements which allow
you to run deeper than any disc will be able to. Three suggestions as you move
towards deeper tillage: 1) Have you identified where the compaction is? How
deep is it? Is it restricted to the headlands and some poor draining areas?
2) If your soils are compacted, what can you do to eliminate wheel traffic concerns?
Lower axle weights? Lower inflation pressures? Control the traffic patterns?
3) If you do some deep tillage this fall, leave some check strips of shallower
tillage to evaluate the return for your equipment and diesel fuel.
No
Fall Tillage
The best practice for reducing erosion and input costs is to eliminate fall
tillage. Producers working on heavy soils, where crop residues are high following
corn, wheat or other crops, may be apprehensive about leaving soils untouched
in the fall. However, following soybeans, there is little justification for
doing fall tillage on most fields in Ontario. Table 3 illustrates that even
on finely textured soils, spring tillage alone (field cultivator, 2 passes)
was generally sufficient when corn followed soybeans in the rotation. Other
demonstration trials established on medium and coarse-textured soils have arrived
at the same conclusion.
Grower experience with spring mulch tillage systems has indicated that, when
working undisturbed soils in the spring, better results are obtained when using
high clearance tines, narrow teeth, and/or packers or rollers in conjunction
with the field cultivator.
Conclusions
Fall discing using an offset disc resulted in yields that were often better
than chisel plowing when both systems received secondary tillage in the spring.
Both systems allowed for reasonable levels of surface residue cover following
cereal crops.
When corn follows soybeans, systems that involve more tillage than spring cultivation
only, often do not produce enough extra corn to pay for the fall tillage operation.
Following winter wheat, if fall discing (tandem or offset) can be accomplished
while leaving the field level with uniform residue cover, corn can often be
successfully planted in the spring with little or no spring tillage.
1