butocpah.gif (2019 bytes)

November 11 , 2002



By Brian Doidge, Market Analyst, Ridgetown College, University of Guelph


U.S. & World
USDA will release its November Supply & Demand estimate November 12. Most observers are expecting another increase in corn crop size projection. F.C. Stone and Sparks, two prominent U.S. analytical firms, both project a crop just over 9 billion bushels. This is up from USDA’s October estimate of 8.973 billion bushels. If confirmed, such an increase would likely move carryout stocks above the 800 million bushel mark and push stocks-to-use percentage over 8%. Sounds negative; but remember, that would still be the fourth lowest percentage in the last 28 years! In other words, we are nipping around the edges; supplies will remain tight until next fall.

CORN, CHATHAM
WKLY AVG ADJ TRACK BASIS
The International Grain Council revised its estimate of world coarse grain production upward at the end of October from 869 mmt to 879 mmt mostly because of the larger U.S. corn crop. World ending stocks were also increased to 132 mmt from 122 mmt. But, just as is the case in the U.S., these higher stocks numbers must be kept in perspective. Stocks remain very low. Compare to 155 mmt in 2001/02, 168 mmt 2000/01, and 191 mmt 1999/00. World coarse grain stocks-to-use percentage remains at levels last seen in the early 1970s.

The weak link in corn markets remains U.S. exports. Marketing year highs in each of the last two weekly export sales reports did little to soothe Chicago trader apprehension. Export sales as of the end of October were 9% behind the pace of last year, and last year had the poorest corn export showing of the last four years.

U.S. exports over the last four years have been hampered by strength in the U.S. dollar, but weakening in the currency through the summer was expected to aid U.S. agricultural export sales. Perhaps it will in time, but at least for corn, major competition from Chinese corn exports to Asian markets has hurt U.S. prices. Sharply higher shipments of Ukraine and Russian feed barley and feed wheat into European, North African and Middle Eastern markets have also sapped U.S. corn prices. The message is that even though stocks in the U.S. and around the world are low, there is an increasing number of more localized competitors in all world markets who enjoy freight advantages (and high domestic subsidies and supports artificially promoting expansion of production) which keep North American prices under pressure.

Little wonder then that Chicago corn futures prices have lost almost 60 cents or 20% since peaking September 11. We are nearing major support at $2.33 in the DEC, $2.45 in the JULY contract. Long-term support is close below at $2.29 and $2.40 respectively. Fundamentals would suggest we will not break below these levels, but given the anaemic performance of U.S. exports, we will not rocket higher either.

What is really happening is that the 2002 U.S. farm bill (the Food Security and Rural Investment Act signed May 2, 2002 and covering the period 2002-2007) is starting to take hold. Corn acreage in the U.S. is expected to increase by about 1 m acres this spring thanks to support payments more favourable to corn than soybeans. It is entirely probable that U.S. corn acreage could exceed 80 million acres in 2003 for the first time since 1998. Using the average yield of the last 5 years (134.1 bu/acre, and harvested acreage of 73 m acres), a crop of 9.79 billion bushels is projected, about 750 million more than this year. The problem is that a crop of that size exceeds demand, especially if exports continue to have trouble because of higher prices and a relatively strong U.S. dollar. Moreover, U.S. feed usage is expected to weaken a bit as a result of cuts in cattle inventory and reductions in hog expansions.
The saving grace is continued expansion in domestic U.S. usage driven by expanding ethanol production. With 67 ethanol plants operational, and another 11 now under construction and scheduled for completion in 2003, U.S. corn usage for ethanol production is projected to exceed 900 m bushels in 2003.

The question for price direction in Chicago boils down to this: can expanding ethanol usage compensate for weakening export and feed demand? Action in Chicago futures prices over the next 3-4 weeks will tell you the answer, or at least the opinion of Chicago traders. If support holds, the jury is still out. If support does not hold and we move lower, the answer is no.


butocpah.gif (2019 bytes)

1