
by Bliss Baker, President,
Canadian Renewable Fuels Assoc.
| The following chart compares Ontario ethanol with some of the more attractive mid-west States. | ||
| Tax Incentives for Ethanol by Jurisdiction | ||
|
Jurisdiction
|
U.S.
Federal Government |
Tax
Exemption
23 cents/litre (equivalent) 10 cents/litre |
|
Ontario
|
14.5
|
24.5
|
|
Wyoming
|
15
|
38
|
|
Montana
|
12
|
35
|
|
Minnesota
|
8
|
31
|
|
South
Dakota
|
8
|
31
|
|
Nebraska
|
8
|
31
|
|
Missouri
|
8
|
31
|
|
Iowa
|
1
|
24
|
| The above chart clearly illustrates the competitive advantage that the U.S. federal government has created for the U.S. ethanol industry. A similar federal tax exemption in Canada would undoubtedly kick-start ethanol production north of the border. These conditions combined with other programs such as a corn subsidy for ethanol expansion have made for very attractive conditions for U.S. production. | ||
The CRFA has recently
conducted a comparison between the Canadian and U.S. ethanol markets and the
respective public policy environments. Based on concerns about the growing spread
in value between U.S. and Canadian ethanol, the CRFA has highlighted some significant
findings about the level of support that the Canadian industry receives. While
it is widely accepted that the differences in the Canadian and U.S. marketplace
largely result from the existing oxygen mandate in the United States, it is
important to understand what this mandate and tax exemptions have done for the
industry south of the border and how Canada can learn from this experience.
From a microeconomic point of view, this relatively new industry in the U.S.
has now created the conditions that will encourage new entrants into the marketplace.
Key among these conditions is the creation of a reformulated gasoline pool.
This market allows for the short-term sale of ethanol into a pool
at premium prices. In Canada, due to the lack of a mandate, the majority of
ethanol is sold on long-term contracts at a discount to gasoline. These long-term
contracts are also critical to obtaining project financing in Canada. This systemic
obstacle to expanding production needs to be addressed if facilities are to
be built in Canada.
Today, over 300 million litres of potential ethanol production in Canada may
never be realized because of some of these obstacles. In addition, a growing
gap between the value for ethanol in the U.S. and Canada has put future ethanol
production in jeopardy. In short, Canada needs to create more value for ethanol
if we are to achieve the growth targets set by the federal government.
Meeting the federal governments target of 1 billion litres of production
by 2010 will require a clear renewable fuels strategy from the federal government.
The federal government is going to have to decide how important ethanol
is to them, said Bliss Baker, President of the Canadian Renewable Fuels
Association. If they want this industry to succeed, they will have to
commit to a clear national strategy that includes a Renewable Fuels mandate
and tax parity with the United States, concluded Baker.
The CRFA has urged Finance Minister Paul Martin to introduce a federal 2-cent
per litre tax credit to encourage oil companies to begin using ethanol and bring
Canada in line with U.S. support for ethanol.
We need your help to make this happen. Please go to the CRFAs website
at www.greenfuels.org and click on the ethanol icon to send an important message
to our federal government in support of expanding ethanol production in Canada.
Thanks for your support.
1