![]()
Seeking
Fall Fertilizer Efficiency
by Greg Stewart, OMAF Specialist
Efforts
to develop an efficient strip tillage system have also included an examination
of fall fertilizer banding. Ideally, the goal was to define a system where phosphorus
and potassium could be placed in the fall during the strip tillage operation,
eliminating the need to have fertilizer on the planter.
Combining fertilizer
placement during fall strip tillage is an approach that may effectively reduce
costs by merging two or three operations into one. The effectiveness of banding
fertilizer in the fall for next years corn crop is still unproven. Minnesota
studies concluded that banding potassium in a ridge tillage system enhanced
yields even when soil tests predicted no yield response. Ontario research (Tony
Vyn, U. of Guelph) has looked at deep-banding significant amounts of potassium
in a fall strip-till system for corn and found no advantage over the more traditional
starter banding via the corn planter.
A
Minnesota study compared various tillage systems and phosphorous placement techniques
including a fall strip tillage system. Some of the results from this work are
highlighted in Table 1. Where corn followed soybeans, researchers compared two
conservation tillage systems, one a single pass with a field cultivator in the
spring, the other a fall strip tillage system followed by direct planting into
the zones in the spring. On average, there was very little difference in corn
yields between the tillage systems. In this study, phosphorous placement techniques
included no P, P via the planter, and P banded in the fall. Fall banding of
P in the plots to be spring-cultivated was performed so that the fall band (5
inches deep) was not located continuously under the corn row, but varied from
directly under the row to as much as 15 inches from the row. P banded via the
strip tillage operation was done using two methods. Method one was to place
P (5 inches deep) directly in line with next years corn row, with this
band fixed in the same position for each year of corn production. Method two
was to offset the fall bands 8 inches from the previous band application. All
yields were assessed in adjacent sites, one with high soil test P and one with
low soil test P.
At
both high and low testing sites, corn yields in the one-pass cultivation system
were significantly lower when P was banded in the fall than those achieved with
starter P placement. At the low testing site only, significantly lower yields
than those obtained with starter P were obtained with P banding in the fall
strip tillage if the bands were offset year to year. If fall P via strip tillage
was placed in the same in-row position from year to year, no significant yield
reductions were detected.
The importance of fall fertilizer band position is also evident from our work
in Ontario. The consensus to date is that P and K applications via strip tillage
in the fall may be too deep to providestarter fertilizer benefits to the following
corn crop. Our approach has been to apply P and K in the fall and then see if
we could get away with nitrogen only on the corn planter the following spring.
On a number of sites, we have seen reduced yields where the corn had been planted
in the absence of a spring starter band. More recently we have investigated
shallower fall banding applications, moving from an average of 6-inch deep bands
to 4-inch deep bands.
Figures
1 and 2 represent some of our tentative findings at a site near Ancaster, Ontario.
Soil test levels were medium for both P and K at these sites. Some of the benefits
of strip tillage at this site have been less need for additional coulters or
weight on the corn planter, and in many cases, drier seed beds allowing for
the possibility of earlier planting. Figure 1 shows corn yields where the banding
of P and K in the fall of 1999 was done deeper (6-7 inches). The nitrogen-only
planting treatments (elimination of spring-applied P and K) resulted in yield
losses compared to the NPK starter banding plots. In the fall of 2000 on an
adjacent site, the P and K banding in the fall was done shallower (roughly 4
inches). 2001 yield results (Figure 2) indicated that corn yields were not depressed
by having nitrogen only applied through the planter when being planted on top
of the fall-tilled, fertilized zone.
Further work needs to be done to confirm that fall fertilizer placement can
be done within a strip tillage system without losses in corn yield or fieldwork
efficiencies. Indications are at this point in time that fall banding operations
need to be particularly concerned with depth of placement and perhaps with the
orientation of previous bands as well.
| Table
1 The effect of tillage and phosphorous placement techniques on corn yields. Averages from 1997- 2000 on a clay loam soil in Waseca, Minnesota. |
|||
| Tillage System |
Phosphorous
Application Method
|
Corn
Yield (bu/ac)
|
|
|
High
P Site
|
Low
P Site
|
||
| Spring Field Cultivate (one pass) |
None
|
168
|
104
|
|
Starter
(via planter)
|
171
|
153
|
|
|
Fall
Band
|
164
|
144
|
|
| Fall Strip Tillage |
None
|
164
|
103
|
|
Starter
(via planter)
|
169
|
151
|
|
|
Fall
Band (fixed)
|
164
|
147
|
|
|
Fall
Band (off-set)
|
169
|
139
|
|
| Note: Where P2O5 was applied, rates were 50 lbs/ac on low testing site and 40 lbs/acre on high testing site. | |||
| G. W. Randall, J.A. Vetsch, University of Minnesota, and T.S. Murrell, Potash and Phosphate Institute. | |||
1